Pievienot darbus Atzīmētie0
Darbs ir veiksmīgi atzīmēts!

Atzīmētie darbi


Skatītie darbi

Darbs ir sekmīgi pievienots grozam!



interneta bibliotēka
Atlants.lv bibliotēka
Latvia Prohibitions Against "Spice" and Prohibitoins in Other Countries
Faila izmērs:
119 KB


Publicēts: 02.02.2015.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Augstskolas
Literatūras saraksts: 10 vienības
Atsauces: Ir
Laikposms: 2008.g. - 2014.g.
Nr. Sadaļas nosaukums  Lpp.
  Introduction    3
1.  Situation in Latvia regarding distribution of “Spice”    4
1.1.  What is “Spice”    5
1.2.  Effects and victims of legal drugs    6
1.3.  “Spice” selling places    6
1.4.  Information how much people know about “Spice”    7
1.5.  Latvian society fight against “legal drugs”    8
2.  Latvia prohibitions about “Spice”    9
2.1.  Reasoning behind regulating “Spice”    9
2.2.  Development of legal regulation concerning legal drugs    9
2.3.  Latvia prohibited “Spice”    10
3.  Other states prohibitions against “legal drugs”    11
3.1.  Ireland    11
3.2.  USA    11
3.3.  Canada    12
3.4.  Australia    12
3.5.  New Zealand    13
  Conclusion    14
  Bibliography    15
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

3.5 New Zealand
Synthetic cannabinoids in New Zealand are controlled under the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013. From the 8th of May 2014 there are no psychoactive substances legally available for sale in New Zealand. Synthetic cannabinoids currently on the market that are planned to be on sale do have limited controls provided under the Smoke-Free Environments Act 1990. It is illegal to sell any smoking product to anyone under the age of 18. However only products that have on their packaging that they are intended to be on sell fall within this law. Those marketed as ‘herbal incense’ and not for ‘human consumption’ are not thought to meet the definition of ‘intended to be smoked’ and therefore are not controlled under the Smoke-free Environments Act 1990. New Zealand have taken a more innovative approach and place the onus on the manufacturer requiring them to prove their products present “no more than a low risk of harm” to be licensed for legal sale .

The main reason that describes the “Spice” is that “Spice” is a horrible invention, because it destroys a people life, some people even are dead of that. From my opinion every state should already prohibit these legal drugs. Of course maybe it isn’t so easy, but a lot of states had to think about this problem earlier. For instance, if Latvia had already prohibited these legal drugs from time when they appeared in Latvia market, we could save people lives, which are taken, and of course we would not have so much addicted people, young addicted people who damaged their brains. In writing this research paper I have been prove my research question, that Latvia give a great effort to prohibited the “Spice”. To sum up, for my it was a good experience to write research paper about “Spice”, because it is very actual topic, but this topic has never been explored so it was difficult to find some legal information about legal drugs.

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Šo materiālu pirkt komplektā ar citiem materiāliem ir izdevīgāk!Izdevīgi!3
Materiālu komplekts Nr. 1346583
Nosūtīt darbu e-pastā

Tavs vārds:

E-pasta adrese, uz kuru nosūtīt darba saiti:

{Tavs vārds} iesaka Tev apskatīties interneta bibliotēkas Atlants.lv darbu par tēmu „Latvia Prohibitions Against "Spice" and Prohibitoins in Other Countries”.

Saite uz darbu:


E-pasts ir nosūtīts.

Izvēlies autorizēšanās veidu

E-pasts + parole

E-pasts + parole

Norādīta nepareiza e-pasta adrese vai parole!

Aizmirsi paroli?


Neesi reģistrējies?

Reģistrējies un saņem bez maksas!

Lai saņemtu bezmaksas darbus no Atlants.lv, ir nepieciešams reģistrēties. Tas ir vienkārši un aizņems vien dažas sekundes.

Ja Tu jau esi reģistrējies, vari vienkārši un varēsi saņemt bezmaksas darbus.

Atcelt Reģistrēties