The Controversy over Contingency Fees in the American Civil Law System
Contingency Fees (when a lawyer takes a portion of a settlement rather than a basic hourly rate) have been a highly debated topic over the past decade. While many critics of these fees believe that they cause greed in lawyers and frivolous cases in the courtroom, many people who could not otherwise afford legal representation disagree. Contingency Fees are the working class person's ticket to the courtroom and a low risk way to seek compensation for their injuries, while awarding exceptional work on the part of their lawyers.
Contingency fees give a middle class person the same access to the courtroom that a person of more affluent means may have. The expense of quality legal representation is not something an average person can afford. For many, giving a percentage of their settlement is a far better alternative than simply letting the matter rest. While many critics of contingency fees have said that lawyers "charge contingency fees to middle and upper income clients who could easily afford to pay on an hourly basis", (Olson 52) this is simply not the case.…
- Argumentation of the Case Involving Tinker and the Des Moines School District Over Freedom of Expression
- The Controversy over Contingency Fees in the American Civil Law System
- University Costs, how Have They Changed Over the Years?
E-pasta adrese, uz kuru nosūtīt darba saiti:
Saite uz darbu: