Saņem informāciju par jaunajiem Atlants.lv darbiem!
Akcija: ZiņotājsPRO uz 6 mēnešiem - bezmaksas!Abonēt bez maksas
Napoleon Banaparte? Was he a hero that was invincible yet structured and dignified through the countries he passionately triumphed? Or did he run for cover when things didn't go like they should've? Did he dishonestly win his battles? Did he have no genius of his own did he live off of others genius instead? Did he attack a country with no mercy no warning? He was not a tyrant people mad him out as a tyrant. Napoleon may not have gone about obtaining his land the conventional way. Instead he did things the way they instinctively came which was not what the people where accustomed to. He wa…
E-pasta adrese, uz kuru nosūtīt darba saiti:
Saite uz darbu: