Saņem informāciju par jaunajiem Atlants.lv darbiem!
Akcija: ZiņotājsPRO uz 6 mēnešiem - bezmaksas!Abonēt bez maksas
Contracts in Restraint of Trade
The term contract can be defined simply as a written or spoken agreement between two or more parties, intended to be enforced by law. Both parties are free to negotiate and draw the frames of their contracts. However this freedom is not unlimited. In certain circumstances a contract may fall into the "illegal contracts" category and for this reason become unenforceable. Herein arise two questions: Firstly, how far can the negotiators go in determining their obligations in order to have a valid agreement and secondly, can the parties go so far as to restrict their own freedom to negotiate?
Despite the various classifications of the illegal contracts in theory they can be divided into two large categories: contracts that break the law and contracts contrary to public policy. In the first category are contracts that contradict the legal provisions of the state, in particular statute and common law. They could generally be defined as contracts relating to committing crime, committing tort, and contracts expressly forbidden by statute. Different authors have slightly different definitions for the second category. Nevertheless in general, the contracts contrary to public policy could be listed as contracts that pervert the course of justice, those promoting sexual immorality, contracts concerning marriage, contracts which oust the jurisdiction of the court and contracts interfering with human rights.…
- Contracts in Restraint of Trade
- Transatlantic Slave Trade, How It Was Organized, who Participated, who Profited
E-pasta adrese, uz kuru nosūtīt darba saiti:
Saite uz darbu: