Saņem informāciju par jaunajiem Atlants.lv darbiem!
Akcija: ZiņotājsPRO uz 6 mēnešiem - bezmaksas!Abonēt bez maksas
Miranda Vs. Arizona. The Supreme Court decision detailed the principles governing police interrogation: The Miranda Rights.
"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws."
The Miranda rule, which makes a confession inadmissible in a criminal trial if the accused was not properly advised of his rights, has been so thoroughly integrated into the justice system that any person who watches television can recite the words: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law". Yet the 1966 Supreme Court ruling in Miranda vs. Arizona remains the subject of debate, and has had a great impac…
- Miranda Vs. Arizona. The Supreme Court decision detailed the principles governing police interrogation: The Miranda Rights.
- Nixon vs. The United States of America. Explains all aspects of the case and the reasons why the Supreme court decided as they did
- The United States Supreme Court
E-pasta adrese, uz kuru nosūtīt darba saiti:
Saite uz darbu: