Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 23.11.2005.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'Football as a Civil Religion', 1.
  • Eseja 'Football as a Civil Religion', 2.
  • Eseja 'Football as a Civil Religion', 3.
  • Eseja 'Football as a Civil Religion', 4.
  • Eseja 'Football as a Civil Religion', 5.
  • Eseja 'Football as a Civil Religion', 6.
  • Eseja 'Football as a Civil Religion', 7.
  • Eseja 'Football as a Civil Religion', 8.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Introduction: Kick-off.
There are two ways of defining religion in terms of its relationship to society. The first is concerned with what religion is, and is therefore substantive. It describes religion as beliefs and practices which assume the existence of supernatural beings. The second approach is functional, concerning itself with what religion does and how it affects the society of which it is part. Religion, according to this view, offers answers to otherwise unanswerable questions, or it binds people together in distinctive forms of collective action. Civil Religion, however, is substantively different from religion in the conventional sense, and functionally similar only with respect to the second role that religion performs, namely, integration. However, this single role is so important in modern societies that its importance cannot be undermined, and Civil Religion has emerged as a field of study under the umbrella of sociology. Before progressing any further, however, it is important to answer the question of what a Civil Religion is, and how its notion came about.

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Atlants