• Critical Thinking Goes Hand in Hand with Decision Making

     

    Eseja2 Vadība

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 03.06.2004.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'Critical Thinking Goes Hand in Hand with Decision Making ', 1.
  • Eseja 'Critical Thinking Goes Hand in Hand with Decision Making ', 2.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Our text is defines decision a process involving six stages:
The first, identifying and diagnosing the problem, requires recognizing a discrepancy between the current state and a desired state and then delving below surface symptoms to uncover the underlying causes of the problem. The second stage, generating alternative solutions, requires adopting ready-made or designing custom-made solutions. The third, evaluating alternatives, means predicting the consequences of different alternatives, sometimes through building scenarios of the future. Fourth, a solution is chosen; the solution might maximize, satisfice, or optimize. Fifth, people implement the decision; this stage requires more careful planning than it often receives. Finally, managers should evaluate how well the decision is working. This means gathering objective, valid information about the impact the decision is having. If the evidence suggests the problem is not getting solved, either a better decision or a better implementation plan must be developed.

Atlants