Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 04.09.2005.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'Critically Comparing and Contrasting Two Approaches to Discourse Analysis', 1.
  • Eseja 'Critically Comparing and Contrasting Two Approaches to Discourse Analysis', 2.
  • Eseja 'Critically Comparing and Contrasting Two Approaches to Discourse Analysis', 3.
  • Eseja 'Critically Comparing and Contrasting Two Approaches to Discourse Analysis', 4.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Introduction:
This assignment will critically describe and compare two approaches to discourse analysis, namely, Speech Act Theory (SAT) and Conversation Analysis (CA). This comparison will cover the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and their similarities and differences and their applications in teaching and learning.
Discourse analysis is the analysis of language in use (Brown and Yule 1983). It also examines how stretches of language become meaningful and unified for their users (Cook 1989). Discourse analysts also consider the relationship between language and the contexts in which it is used and are concerned with the description and analysis of both spoken and written interactions (McCarthy 1991). Its primary purpose is to provide a deeper understanding and appreciation of texts.

Atlants