• How the Conflict Between Roman Duty and Egyptian Sensuousness Develops the Tragedy of Antony and Cleopatra Comments

     

    Eseja3 Vēsture, kultūra

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 11.12.2003.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'How the Conflict Between Roman Duty and Egyptian Sensuousness Develops the Trage', 1.
  • Eseja 'How the Conflict Between Roman Duty and Egyptian Sensuousness Develops the Trage', 2.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Antony epitomizes the traditional tragic hero. The elements that constitute Antony's tragic standing are centrally developed by the conflict between Roman duty and Egyptian sensuousness. The audience empathises with the nature of his demise, as it deems Antony a morally respectable person, and can understand his downfall as a result of the conflict.
The conflict embodies his tragic flaw, which is his stubbornness in trying to achieve an elusive compromise between his duty to Rome and his passion for Cleopatra. Antony's priorities repeatedly sway in favour of Rome and then Cleopatra indeterminably and uncompromisingly. The audience experiences catharsis upon witnessing the protagonist's demise in light of this weakness, as his sense of honour catalyses it, leaving the spectator feeling morally inferior. …

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Atlants