• Chronicles 1 and 2: My Continued Struggle to Prove how the Bible Is Based on Lies

     

    Eseja3 Reliģija

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 11.11.2005.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'Chronicles 1 and 2: My Continued Struggle to Prove how the Bible Is Based on Lie', 1.
  • Eseja 'Chronicles 1 and 2: My Continued Struggle to Prove how the Bible Is Based on Lie', 2.
  • Eseja 'Chronicles 1 and 2: My Continued Struggle to Prove how the Bible Is Based on Lie', 3.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

1 CHRONICLES
I-IX: The first nine chapters perfectly exemplify the endless genealogies that Paul tells us to avoid in 1Tim.i.4 and Tit.iii.9.
i.25: Shortest verse in the Old Testament in case you were wondering.
i.32: This verse refers to Keturah as Abraham's concubine when Gen.xxv.1 says that she was his wife.
i.43: For some reason the editors copied the verse of Gen.xxxvi.31.
ii.15: It states here that David was Jesse's seventh son. Given that seven is a number of great symbolic significance, that is not too surprising. However, 1Sam.xvi.10-11 states that he was actually his eighth, so which 'divinely inspired' author is correct?
iii.19-20: the sons of Zerubbabel; Meshullam, and Hananiah, Jusha-bhesed, five. How can there be five sons of Zerubbabel when 7 males and one female are listed?
iii.22: Hattush, and Igeal and Barial, and Neariah, and Shaphat, six. Five names don't total six.

Atlants