Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 27.12.2002.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'Should the United States Maintain the Embargo on Cuba', 1.
  • Eseja 'Should the United States Maintain the Embargo on Cuba', 2.
  • Eseja 'Should the United States Maintain the Embargo on Cuba', 3.
  • Eseja 'Should the United States Maintain the Embargo on Cuba', 4.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Fidel Castro seized control of the Cuban government in 1959, and set out to change relations with the United States. As relations declined with the United States, the Cuban government developed stronger ties with the Soviet Union, and became a communist country. In response to this intent, the United States placed an economic embargo on Cuba and later ended all diplomatic relations with the Cuban government. Now that the Soviet Union has dissolved and left Cuba on its own, should the economic embargo continue.
Fidel Castro's revolutionary forces overthrow the military dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista on January 1, 1959. The United States recognized the new government on January 7, 1959. Terrence Cannon (109) explains, "There is no mystery about what happened between the United States and the Cuban Revolution. The morning Batista fled, two forces came into a head-on conflict: the needs of the Cuban people verse the economic policies of the United States' corporations that owned the factories and fields of Cuba. The victory over Batista meant that the Cuban people had done away with the local overseer; now they confronted the owner of the plantation - - American Imperialism". This conflict was inevitable if the Revolution was going to execute the reforms, it had been promising since 1953.

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Atlants