Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 11.07.2004.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'How We Teach and how Students Learn', 1.
  • Eseja 'How We Teach and how Students Learn', 2.
  • Eseja 'How We Teach and how Students Learn', 3.
  • Eseja 'How We Teach and how Students Learn', 4.
  • Eseja 'How We Teach and how Students Learn', 5.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

During the past fifteen years, a steadily increasing number of physicists have been contributing to the growth of a new field for scholarly inquiry: the learning and teaching of physics. We have by now a rich source of documented information in the many published reports of this research. At this point, it seems reasonable to ask whether we have learned anything from this collective experience that would be useful in current efforts to bring about innovative reform in the introductory course. Results from research indicate that at all levels of instruction the difference between what is taught and what is learned is often greater than most instructors realize. This discrepancy suggests the following question: Is there a corresponding mismatch between how we teach and how students learn?
I. TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO INSTRUCTION
Instruction in introductory physics has traditionally been based on the instructor's view of the subject and the instructor's perception of the student.

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Atlants