• Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Marxist Theories of Stratification

     

    Eseja3 Politika

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 04.04.2003.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Marxist Theories of Stratification', 1.
  • Eseja 'Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Marxist Theories of Stratification', 2.
  • Eseja 'Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Marxist Theories of Stratification', 3.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Functionalist and Marxist Theories of Stratification
Stratification is the separation of society into layers which are distinguished by unequal rewards and life chances and many systems of stratification have been based on slavery, caste and feudalism.
Slavery, being the oldest and most extreme form of stratification, involves the enslavement or ownership of others. This ownership came about as a result of conquest, trade, kidnapping, hereditary status or the repayment of a debt. The classic example of the caste system is based on the Hindu religion, where caste codes have to be obeyed before being reborn into a new, higher caste. Feudalism stems from medieval Europe where the ranking system of status groups, known as estates, became dominant. The system was closely related to property and political power with landownership being the key.
Though gender and ethnicity have become increasingly important in recent years, social class is probably the most important form of stratification and is not seen as natural or interchangeable, but as being influenced by historical developments.

Atlants