In Willy Loman's character, Arthur Miller has created a stereotypical 1930's working class male. As his name implies, he is a 'low man', an ordinary person. Some might believe that he fits all criteria, as defined by Aristotle, necessary to be considered as a conventional tragic hero. However, others may disagree, arguing that Willy's self-deception and frequent moral lapses prevent him from being recognised as the true hero of a tragedy. In my opinion, even though Willy does not have the power, dignity or influence that usual tragic heroes have, he does qualify. Willy invokes a deep emotional response, due to his ever-resistant hope and respectable motives.…
