Autors:
Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 02.12.2019.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 1.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 2.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 3.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 4.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 5.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 6.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 7.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 8.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 9.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 10.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 11.
  • Konspekts 'Comparison of the Two Companies and Products', 12.
SatursAizvērt
Nr. Sadaļas nosaukums  Lpp.
  The aim and tasks    3
  BMW (Bayerische Motoren Werke AG)    4
  FORD    5
  BMW M4    6
  Ford Mustang GT Performance Pack 2    7
  Comparision of BMW M4 and Ford Mustang GT Performance Pack 2    8
  Conclusions    9
  List of Literature    10
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Conclusions
• Both are billion companies, producing most powerful automobiles and sell in own market.
• The character of BMW M4 better for Europe, because of agressive look.
• Mustang have American style, because of that not popular in Europe.
• Technologies are similar, but markets different.
• Mustang win in Lap time competition and that is one of the most popular way how to understand – who is better?
• We can think about practical adhibition of both cars. Mustang have fuel consumption 25L per 100 Km, but BMW 15L per 100 Km. In conclusion we know about price, it is Mustang 45 000 EUR and BMW 70 000 EUR.
• Winner in long term is BMW.
…

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Atlants