Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 31.05.2004.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'Why Was Stonehenge Built? ', 1.
  • Eseja 'Why Was Stonehenge Built? ', 2.
  • Eseja 'Why Was Stonehenge Built? ', 3.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

An historical investigation into the changing theories associated with the purpose of the mysterious Stonehenge.
Synopsis
Throughout the ages Stonehenge has remained as an indecipherable enigma despite numerous attempts by historians to determine for what Stonehenge was originally constructed. This essay explores the development of historical investigations and analyses the existence of proposed theories based upon the historians' purpose and the evidence used in the construction of these theories. Within the essay the following focus questions will be addressed: What are the theories? Who constructed these theories? How were these theories constructed? How has context influenced the theories? What are the differences within the theories?
These questions will be addressed in relation with time, context and purpose. Theories will be examined in chronological order beginning in the 12th century with Geoffrey of Monmouth's medieval theory and suggestion of a Roman temple by Inigo Jones in the 17th century through to the 18th century Druidical views of John Aubrey and Dr. William Stukeley; the archaeo-astronomical views of Norman Lockyer, Gerald Hawkins and Alexander Thom, and finally Terrence Meaden's modern 'Marriage of the God's" theory.

Atlants