• Who Should Decide when "Extraordinary Means" to Preserve Life Should Be Discontinued?

     

    Eseja2 Socioloģija

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 05.06.2004.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'Who Should Decide when "Extraordinary Means" to Preserve Life Should Be Disconti', 1.
  • Eseja 'Who Should Decide when "Extraordinary Means" to Preserve Life Should Be Disconti', 2.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Who should decide when "extraordinary means" to preserve life should be discontinued? The individual, the family, or the government? In my opinion, I would say that no one has the right to end another person life no matter what pain they undergo. Taking away a human's life is considered immoral, unethical, and unlawful, and it is considering a crime. In other word, I'm totally oppose the idea of euthanasia. Euthanasia is "Inducing the painless death of a person for reasons assumed to be merciful?". …

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Atlants