• "The Distinction Between [Organizations and Their Environments] Is Arbitrary and Idiosyncratically Related to Particular Positions and Point of View" (Dawson, 1966)

     

    Eseja4 Vadība

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 01.12.1996.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja '"The Distinction Between [Organizations and Their Environments] Is Arbitrary and', 1.
  • Eseja '"The Distinction Between [Organizations and Their Environments] Is Arbitrary and', 2.
  • Eseja '"The Distinction Between [Organizations and Their Environments] Is Arbitrary and', 3.
  • Eseja '"The Distinction Between [Organizations and Their Environments] Is Arbitrary and', 4.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

All organisations interact with the environment to varying extents. This stems from the concept that an organisation can be characterised as an open system, one that interacts with and reacts to its environment. Thus, an organisation observes its environment, perceives any threats or opportunities and evolves as required. The environment can be classified as everything outside of an organisation or all elements that are not formally defined as belonging to the organisation (Dill, 1962, cited in Downey, Hellriegel & Slocum, 1975). This is only one definition of the organisation-environment boundary. "This boundary can be drawn anywhere for the purpose of analysis" (Elliot, 1980, cited in Thompson, 1995, p. 62). Defining the limits of an organisation is dependent on the organisation, situation and reasons for definition initially. The defined organisational environment can be then further broken down into the organisations specific and general environments. Robbins & Barnwell (2002) define the specific environment as the elements that are directly relevant in accomplishing the organisation's goals. The specific environment is dependent on the trade of the organisation, what inputs are received, what outputs are produced, direct competitors and any regulatory authorities that apply.…

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Atlants