• It compares Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau in Regards to Social Contract, the State of Nature and Each of Their Ideal Governments

     

    Eseja3 Filosofija

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 24.04.2002.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'It compares Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau in Regards to Social Contract, the State ', 1.
  • Eseja 'It compares Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau in Regards to Social Contract, the State ', 2.
  • Eseja 'It compares Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau in Regards to Social Contract, the State ', 3.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Hobbes invites us to take place in a thought experiment where equals and nonequals are placed together in a state of nature without the existence of a state power placed over them. Hobbes believes that the people will soon lapse into a state of war where each person is threatened with violent attack. He says the conflict is caused by three basic factors, which are, competition, diffidence and glory. Competition consists in the fact that in the state of nature, if there is some resource which a person wants there are no restraints on getting it other than the physical and mental powers of other people. Glory, consists in the concern that each person has to have value for others. But arguably, more important than either of these, is diffidence. This is essentially the suspicion that another may be about to attack you, a suspicion that makes it rational for you to get in the first blow.…

Atlants