Budgetary constraints inhibit achievement of sample sizes large enough to produce a wide range of answers with confidences.
III.Misuses of Statistics: Depending on the research community experience involvement in research characteristically leads researchers to revise, sometimes substantially, any views they may have earlier held in the topic. But this is hardly an answer to the possibility that "preconceptions" might distort the collection and presentation of data. And since, as I believe, that everyone has values indicates that no research can be done without some "preconceptions."
10.Conclusion :
There is currently a gap in the legal and social science literature that has often left scholars, lawyers, and policymakers without basic knowledge of legal systems or with false or distorted impressions. Even simple descriptive data about the functioning of courts and the legal systems are often lacking. Reform and intellectual debate have previously proceeded in an empirical vacuum. Courts and lawyers often do not know what to make of empirical findings in part because they so rarely encounter them.
In addition, there is a probable effect of social science research on law reform, which is embodied in the risk that absorption in social science becomes so complete that the normative role of the law minimised or even forgotten.
…
