Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 29.08.2004.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'Convicts and the Writing of History: Reality or Myth?', 1.
  • Eseja 'Convicts and the Writing of History: Reality or Myth?', 2.
  • Eseja 'Convicts and the Writing of History: Reality or Myth?', 3.
  • Eseja 'Convicts and the Writing of History: Reality or Myth?', 4.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Historiography, or the methodology used for historical study and writing, helps demonstrate that the present is not divorced from the past; rather that history is a continuous dialogue with it. There are many contentious issues in writing history, depending on the agenda behind the accounts. This is shown clearly through attitudes to the Australian convicts. This essay will examine the historiography of writing Australian history, through authors such as MacIntyre, Pascoe, Windschuttle and Clark, then will focus on some of the debates concerning the convicts to demonstrate the arguments historians like Smith, Shlomowitz, Damousi and Hancock face.
One of the most problematic areas in the writing of Australian history is that, on the whole, it has been uneventful in the traditional sense, meaning that there were no large-scale revolutions, civil wars or struggles for independence. Therefore, a successful historian must, through necessity, be able to dramatise what would otherwise be no longer than a few paragraphs. …

Atlants