• The Case Law Study of Multi-Modal Transport Issue

     

    Eseja4 Tiesības

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 22.05.2006.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'The Case Law Study of Multi-Modal Transport Issue', 1.
  • Eseja 'The Case Law Study of Multi-Modal Transport Issue', 2.
  • Eseja 'The Case Law Study of Multi-Modal Transport Issue', 3.
  • Eseja 'The Case Law Study of Multi-Modal Transport Issue', 4.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

See El Greco (Australia) Pty Ltd v Mediterranean Shipping Co SA. In this case, a majority of the Federal Court of Australia held that a statement in a bill of lading that a container was said to contain a number of "pieces posters and prints" was not an effective enumeration of the contents "as packed in such article of transport" under Article IV Rule 5(c) of the Hague-Visby Rules. In consequence, the container was to be regarded as the package or unit for limitation purposes.
Conclusion
To sum up, VMeen Business Corporation found who is responsible carrier, EasyRide or Eastern Pride, then localise the damage or the loss to the cargo, whether the damage occurred on the road or on the sea, then to find the appropriate convention to apply, use CMR or Hague/Visby to determine the appropriate remedy.

Atlants