• The Difference Between Law and Government Structure Within These Communities

     

    Eseja6 Socioloģija

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 01.12.1996.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'The Difference Between Law and Government Structure Within These Communities', 1.
  • Eseja 'The Difference Between Law and Government Structure Within These Communities', 2.
  • Eseja 'The Difference Between Law and Government Structure Within These Communities', 3.
  • Eseja 'The Difference Between Law and Government Structure Within These Communities', 4.
  • Eseja 'The Difference Between Law and Government Structure Within These Communities', 5.
  • Eseja 'The Difference Between Law and Government Structure Within These Communities', 6.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well as similarities. One area of such, is their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways similar, but in many ways different.
The Micmac reside in what is now Nova Scotia, eastern New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and southern Gaspe. The territory was subdivided in to seven districts. Each of these districts contained family groupings in small settlements based on hunting and fishing. Those from P.E.I. held more territory in common than any other Micmac district. Their land was allotted by family.
The Iroquois were a agricultural people. They lived in permanent villages in a domain now called southern Ontario, southern Quebec, and northeastern United States. Indian Nations living here formed a formal and lasting confederacy by 1450. Their members were called 'Ho-De-No-Sau-Nee'. The league was called 'Kanonsionni', meaning EXTENDED HOUSE. …

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Atlants