The discussion of the philosophical question of historical explanation is in reality a disagreement concerning the nature of the philosophic method.
There are primarily two sides taken in this argument, those who agree with Carl Hempel and those that do not.
According to Hempel a historical event is only sufficiently explained when it logically fits a set of confirmed pre-existing conditions along with some universal laws.
Certainly all things cannot easily be assigned to rules and laws. Political coups, assassinations and revolutions are too complex for such a rigid explanation. And w…
