• The Cases of Two English Monarchs who Broke with Convention by Selecting Spouses for Reasons of the Heart, Rather than Political Convenience

     

    Eseja3 Vēsture, kultūra

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 16.04.2003.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'The Cases of Two English Monarchs who Broke with Convention by Selecting Spouses', 1.
  • Eseja 'The Cases of Two English Monarchs who Broke with Convention by Selecting Spouses', 2.
  • Eseja 'The Cases of Two English Monarchs who Broke with Convention by Selecting Spouses', 3.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

SHOULD THE MONARCH OR HEIR to throne marry for love? `Of course' is the answer most people in Britain would give today, but history suggests otherwise. It is not just that the 1689 Bill of Rights and the 1701 Act of Settlement rule out marriage with a Roman Catholic. Monarchs and heirs to the throne have never had the freedom of choice which their subjects enjoy.
Since the Norman Conquest (setting aside the present Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles), the only two English or British monarchs to have personally chosen wives are Edward IV (r. 1461-83) and his grandson, Henry VIII (r. 1509-47). Heirs presumptive have succeeded when already married, but for monarchs, arranged marriage has been the rule and so too for heirs apparent, (Edward the Black Prince was the only exception). In recent centuries some attention has been paid to individual preference. …

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Atlants