• The Validity of the Cosmological, Ontological, and Teleological Arguements

     

    Eseja2 Filosofija

Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 03.01.2004.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Vidusskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Nav
  • Eseja 'The Validity of the Cosmological, Ontological, and Teleological Arguements', 1.
  • Eseja 'The Validity of the Cosmological, Ontological, and Teleological Arguements', 2.
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

The topic I will be discussing in this essay is whether or not the ontological, the cosmological, or the teleological arguements provide sufficient evidence to prove the existence of the Supreme Personal Being. All three arguements have points for and against them, but whether they prove the existence of God (from here on out taken to mean the Supreme Personal Being) or not remains still to be a topic of debate.
The weakest of the three arguements is the ontological arguement. The Christian theologian Anselm(1033-1109) believed that we can concieve of the greatest possible being, and this…

Atlants